American Agencies - scummy collectors
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
My appeal brief regarding the Experian perjury and American Agencies
The longer I worked on that brief, the more pissed off I got. I have no idea how I can even deal with all this BS, the lies, lies and more lies, perjury, and judge Broomfield not giving a damn.
Nobody can imagine how fed up I am.
Been working on a new website just about the Experian perjury and I will be sending out a press release, hopefully next week.
It’s amazing how it’s all so totally depressing that I really didn’t deal with it until I had the appeals deadline. I’m thoroughly motivated now.
Enough is enough!
2003 Suit (appealed, Experian filed credit reports on PACER) • 2007 Appeal - American Agencies, Experian, CIC • American Agencies - scummy collectors • ConsumerInfo.com - incomplete reports • Experian - countless violations • (0) Comments • Permalink
Friday, December 09, 2005
Bank account info needed for American Agencies and American Home Loans (CBSK) to collect judgments
Two readers wrote that they have UNPAID judgments against American Agencies (collector) and American Home Loans (CBSK), a scummy junk faxer.
Since I’m way behind on mail this week I’ll just reply to both here and maybe this posting will get me some of the info to assist with the collection of these debts.
I’m aware of numerous settlements by both companies, most likely paid from the company checking account. However, since they haven’t paid *me*, I don’t have this info handy. If I had nothing else to do, I could certainly spend a few hours going through my email and contacting people who wrote that they settled, but unfortunately I’m way too busy.
However, if you email me the scanned judgment (or fax to 571-222-1000) for posting (I can take your personal info off), it’s quite likely that someone will submit banking info and I’ll make a personal effort to get you paid.
I’d love to post judgments against a DEADBEAT collector like American Agencies and junk faxer CBSK. That American Agencies isn’t paying doesn’t surprise me at all, but that CBSK won’t respond to collection letters for a judgment obtained because they didn’t pay for services is hard to believe. I know the loan business is slow, but is it THAT slow? Is CBSK going to be one of the first mortgage companies to go out of business?
I’m sending this URL to the CBSK attorney to make sure this is real.
2003 Suit (appealed, Experian filed credit reports on PACER) • American Agencies - scummy collectors • Junk faxes and SPAM • (0) Comments • Permalink
Friday, December 17, 2004
12/13/04: American Agencies motion for summary judgment granted - despite obvious perjury
Railroaded again!
It is absolutely amazing. If I wanted to show how corrupt the legal system is, I couldn’t have asked for anything better.
The 12/13/04 Order - 16 pages.
In his 10/7/03 declaration, Zulkifli Iljas, Manager - Executive Office, Pac Bell, states that they SOLD this disputed debt “on or about 2/13/03” to American Agencies.
He also left out ALL assignments for collection, and that’s why Judge Broomfield decided that I couldn’t hold Pac Bell (now SBC) liable for Am. Ag. violations.
And regardless of the obvious differences between the Pac Bell and American Agencies declarations, just looking at Tom Wells’ various versions in his own declarations, it couldn’t be any more obvious what a lying scumbag Wells is.
Not only was Wells unable to put a correct company name in his own declaration and I had to point out that there is no such company, but one of my issues was their name and that they denied that “American Credit Agencies” had anything to do with my account while at the same time they did NOT dispute the authenticity of the Tom Wells answer to the small claims court FOR “American Credit Agencies.”
Of course that small claims court answer was nothing but lies too, as they now admit to all the FDCPA vioalation, but they are time barred since the SOL is only one year. It would be difficult to dispute the authenticty of a document filed at the courthouse with Tom Wells’ original signature on it.
Fortunately for American Agencies and all the corporate scum, federal court is obviously not very concerned with truth and justice.
And THAT explains why American Agencies ignored the small claims complaint, didn’t show up for the mandatory hearing, and couldn’t care less about perjury.
I’ve become conditioned to perjury and fabricated evidence, so this didn’t surprise me too much. The junk faxers do it all the time, they submit totally fake documents to the court, claiming they got permission to fax. And apparently that works.
The Experian declaration is hilarious.
I sued them in small claims court in 2002 for disclosure of the permissible purpose of all inquiries including the American Agencies inquiries. They refused to give me the info, and I dismissed the small claims case because I didn’t know what to do.
After almost 2 years of litigation in federal court, which Experian of course is a party to, they didn’t think to let me know that all these credit reports stating that American Agencies received my credit reports are wrong.
Although, I really believe they lied in the declaration, which of course I couldn’t respond to because they attached it to their reply.
How a judge could allow this to stand without discovery, especially since not only MY exhibits show the “inquiries” (not changes or deletions) - MIS (CreditData SW) submitted a reports with these inquiries too. Which I obviously pointed out during oral arugments. And, my copy of the Experian declaration didn’t even look like an original, I thought it was a fax.
Well, that’s going to be very interesting, I’ll of course amend my complaint to include a new claim against Experian.
I can see that they’re all tremendously enjoying this. But what makes them think they’ll get away with either perjury or providing knowingly totally false information on the consumer reports?
The Experian conduct and refusal to disclose the permissible purpose for inquiries deserves a press release.
It’s rather funny that my AZ licensing claims were based on “debt management” companies, not collectors. I just searched the A.R.S and all I could find was the requirement for a license in Title 6:
6-126 - Application fees for financial institutions and enterprises
American Agencies didn’t have a license back then, but since I’ve sued them, they did get licensed, with another new name: “American Agencies of California”
I’m wondering if it was pure genius by American Agencies to not point out that I had the wrong Article, knowing that if they did, I would have of course changed it. By not saying anything, the judge just dismissed and I didn’t get a chance to fix that.
Is that an example of great lawyering?
I still don’t know if/when/how I can appeal. Can’t figure this appeal thing out.
It’s definitely time for a press realease about the American Agencies and Pac Bell situation. I don’t know how to word my claim in legalese, but Pac Bell sold my *debt* to American Agencies after I sued them in small claims and they KNEW that the debt was fraudulent.
There’s got to be something wrong with that, not just morally, but legally. They even made a point to call me and to let me know! It wasn’t about the $5 or $10 (if they got this much), they made sure I continued to worry about that collection.
2003 Suit (appealed, Experian filed credit reports on PACER) • American Agencies - scummy collectors • Pacific Bell - billing fraud & PERJURY! • (4) Comments • Permalink
Wednesday, November 03, 2004
American Agencies fudging reply and certificate of service date
I was just cleaning up my office and filing the American Agencies papers when I noticed that the Tom Wells declaration was faxed from American Agencies to their attorneys on 8/2.
I also remember at the time posting here on 8/2 that apparently they are not responding, and then I did get a response dated 7/30/04. I also checked the postmark. I guess they were waiting for the fax on Friday, 7/30, and then didn’t get it till Monday.
It bothers me is that they didn’t change the date on the filing, certificate of service and postmark. Everything reads 7/30. So they filed on 8/2, although the docket wasn’t updated till 8/4.
I’ve been considering filing a published complaint with the AZ State Bar about Martin, Hart & Fullerton. Not because the State Bar gives a damn, but so that people can see what kind of scum they are.
They have lied so many times, I’m planning on posting the scanned excerpts from their filings with the proof that they KNEW they lied. Since they lied so many times, that’s quite a project.
Licensed to lie!
2003 Suit (appealed, Experian filed credit reports on PACER) • American Agencies - scummy collectors • (0) Comments • Permalink
Tuesday, August 31, 2004
New Arizona name: “American Agencies of California, LLC”
The AZ Corporation Commission info
They’re also sending out some funky letters in response to disputes. It’s really important that readers carefully review the “real” reports to determine whether the dispute notice is really reported. Please read: The notice of dispute may be ineffective
They also state: “We look forward to assisting you with this potential opportunity to improve your credit and credit score.”
Of course “potential” is the keyword here. Announcement to creditors and collectors - rev. 2/29/04 - Discharge if you qualify!
I wonder if they set up the new LLC in case the FTC shuts down the corporations.
2003 Suit (appealed, Experian filed credit reports on PACER) • American Agencies - scummy collectors • (0) Comments • Permalink
