ConsumerInfo.com - incomplete reports

Wednesday, March 22, 2006

First Amended Complaint for my 2003 federal credit suit

3/15/06 First Amended Complaint

So now we’re down to Experian, ConsumerInfo.com, Nelnet and Verizon.

I’ve been so busy, tomorrow I’ll post my objection to the Verizon motion for summary judgment.  This sure is as aggravating as it gets.

I am so sick of having to pay my bills TWICE!

As I wrote in my discovery responses to Verizon:

It would really help if somebody at Verizon or its genius lawyers actually read my complaint, initial disclosures and publications.  But then again, what can I expect from people who are too dimwitted to perform the simplest calculations:

$84.58 - $90 - $85 + $90 = ?????  How much do I owe?

Is everybody at Verizon and representing Verizon retarded?

Instead of apologizing, Verizon is demanding that I pay their attorneys fees!

More on that tomorrow.

Posted by Christine on 03/22/2006 at 03:08 AM
2003 Suit (appealed, Experian filed credit reports on PACER) • ConsumerInfo.com - incomplete reports • Experian - countless violations • Nelnet - willful incorrect credit reporting • Verizon Wireless - billing fraud • (2) Comments • Permalink

Thursday, September 02, 2004

Still unable to order PrivacyGuard reports

“Due to inactivity on this page and for your security, your access to this page has been restricted. Please click on the “HOME” button above to re-access the page.”

I’ll name them with Trans Union in my new complaint, I’ve had it!

Posted by Christine on 09/02/2004 at 08:11 PM
2003 Suit (appealed, Experian filed credit reports on PACER) • ConsumerInfo.com - incomplete reports • (0) Comments • Permalink

Wednesday, September 01, 2004

Couldn’t order my PrivacyGuard report

I haven’t tried in a while, been too busy.  But that’s the 2nd time I couldn’t get my PrivacyGuard (ConsumerInfo.com) report:

“Due to inactivity on this page and for your security, your access to this page has been restricted. Please click on the “HOME” button above to re-access the page.”

Posted by Christine on 09/01/2004 at 04:06 AM
2003 Suit (appealed, Experian filed credit reports on PACER) • ConsumerInfo.com - incomplete reports • (0) Comments • Permalink

Saturday, May 01, 2004

Inquiries do NOT raise scores (ConsumerInfo.com lies)

I've been wondering why people have been insisting that inquiries raise scores.

Here's the screenshot with that entirely FALSE statement:
Continue reading ...
Posted by Christine on 05/01/2004 at 04:59 AM
2003 Suit (appealed, Experian filed credit reports on PACER) • ConsumerInfo.com - incomplete reports • (5) Comments • Permalink

5/1/04 PG-ConsumerInfo.com mortgage inquiries - deduplicated?

If this report was complete and FCRA compliant, I could see the "soft" inquiries, including my own. Still wondering whether someone ordered my Equifax.

I applied for a mortgage (long story to be told at another time) and they apparently used Equifax for the mortgage credit report. It is odd that Equifax reports the inquiry as "Miscellaneous Reptg. Agencies", Experian as "Mortgage Reporters" and Trans Union as "Miscellaneous and public record."

Also, there's the 2/27/04 RNB inquiriy, when I called after they lowered my credit limit. I don't think I got an adverse action letter, looks like all I got is a hard inquiry. Hmmmm ....

The screenshot:


Continue reading ...
Posted by Christine on 05/01/2004 at 04:18 AM
2003 Suit (appealed, Experian filed credit reports on PACER) • ConsumerInfo.com - incomplete reports • (0) Comments • Permalink
Page 2 of 7 pages  <  1 2 3 4 >  Last »