Miller v. Cohen & Slamowitz court order: unfair practices violate FDCPA
Incredibly, Cohen & Slamowitz FAILED to assign attorneys to active cases until consumers filed an answer even AFTER the court ruled against them in the Miller case in 9/09.
Of course MOST collection lawyers have nothing but contempt for consumers and they ignore disputes. The calls are usually routed to aggressive COLLECTORS who TALK like attorneys and intimidate consumers into settling or making partial payment arrangements. That’s what happened to me at Cohen & Slamowitz.
I really hope my client can find an attorney to represent him on contingency.
A lot more info:
Arthur Miller v. Cohen & Slamowitz: attorney’s failure to conduct meaningful review violates FDCPA
Posted by Christine on 07/12/2010 at 05:05 PM
Legal • Court - rulings - procedures • Credit - Collection - Economic News • (0) Comments • Permalink
