Mohave county attorney Michael McGill declines to investigate attorney Keith Knochel perjury
Just as expected, one scum sucking attorney protecting the other.
I had talked to McGill last week, well, what can you expect from a LAWYER?
No offense to the few honest lawyers, I know they exist. But it sure is incredible to experience so much corruption first hand.
I just scanned and uploaded McGill’s letter and my response and attachments.
Via fax to 928-753-2669—9 pages including cover
Attn: Michael P. McGill
Deputy County Attorney
Kingman, AZFebruary 6, 2008
Re: 1/24/08 letter declining to investigate attorney Keith Knochel’s Perjury
BHCPD 2008-002371Mr. McGill:
Pursuant to our telephone conversation, I am hereby providing you with the documentation proving beyond any doubt that attorney Keith Knochel committed perjury.
1) Motive: my 11/29/07 fax to Mr. Knochel, advising that my Requests for Admissions to his client United Online will be deemed admitted if responses are not provided by the 11/29/07 deadline.
2) Perjury: Mr. Knochel subsequently provided the notarized 11/29/07 Verification, stating that he is a defendant (i.e. employed by United Online) in this action.
3) Admission: My 12/12/07 fax to Mr. Knochel regarding the scheduling of his deposition if he is in fact a United Online employee and Mr. Knochel’s 12/19/07 response, admitting that he is NOT a United Online employee.
I am of course willing to testify and to have my computer examined (the faxes were received electronically), should there be any question about the authenticity of my documentation. However, considering Mr. Knochel’s admission, that should not be necessary.
ADDITIONAL ISSUES:
1) Mr. Knochel made numerous statements in the verified Initial Disclosures and Responses to my Requests for Admissions he KNEW to be false.
For example, in the United Online Initial Disclosures Mr. Knochel states:
“CHRISTINE BAKER’S actions have caused our client to incur legal fees in excess of $6,000.”
According to the 1/14/08 Affidavit of Attorneys Fees, also verified by Mr. Knochel, his legal fees was $5,217 up to and including 11/29/07.
Mr. Knochel made additional false statements in the Initial Disclosures and he also denied Requests for Admissions that he knew to be true. I’ll be happy to provide a detailed listing of all false statements, but due to the number of lies, it will take a couple of weeks to go through the documents.
2) As I told you, I am encouraging millions of consumers to stop paying their unsecured debt and I therefore have a question for you:
Would you prosecute a consumer who omits assets or income at a debtor’s examination?
Please feel free to contact me anytime, best by email or fax as snail mail from Kingman takes often 5 days to be delivered.
Very truly yours,
Christine Baker
I’ve been working on my new blogs, nothing’s ever easy. But as soon as everything looks good, the Knochel blog will be one of the first ones to go live and next is the press release.
Since I read that in California you can sue for perjury by filing a tort claim, I’m wondering if I should file suit in there. Of course I have my appeal here in Arizona superior court, but I’m obviously well above the $10k limit for justice court. So remanding back to justice court isn’t really helpful.
I would be so cool to have a lawyer who gives damn and with the dough to file a multi-million dollar suit against United Online and Knochel. As I was reviewing Knochel’s attorneys fees for a total of $8,475 and considering that I spent at least twice the time, I’d be happy with $20k for my costs and $50k for the stress as of right now.
It’s no wonder I didn’t get heating in my house before winter. Dealing with the Focus and United Online discovery issues and the United Online entirely frivolous motion for summary judgment and earning a living, when could I have worked on my house?
A few million dollars should be spent on establishing an organization that actually INVESTIGATES and LITIGATES corporate fraud. I’m so sick of dealing with this crap.
Now that Edwards dropped out, he’s got NOTHING to do. As a lawyer, that would be a job for him.
Any Edwards fans reading here?
How about you contact him and get him to do something useful?
Posted by Christine on 02/06/2008 at 11:12 PM
2007 United Online (NetZero) suit (on appeal - venue) • Attorney Keith Knochel perjury • (1) Comments • Permalink
Give him hell. I agree with you that most lawyers are scum sucking pigs. I work in a lawyers office and trust me if I had to do it over again I would chose another profession. I am tired of the rich taking advantage of the poor. I am also tired of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer.
