Friday, April 22, 2005
James Morrison aka Lizardking accused of defrauding creditors and filing frivolous suits
I’ve been meaning to post this for a while, and in light of so many court rulings expressly condoning false promises, misrepresentations and perjury by corporations, it’s about time we look at the standards for consumers and corporations.
Unfortunately, http://lizardkingexposed.com/ removed the page with the evidence.
But, thanks to Google, we have the Google cache for lizardkingexposed.com
Update 4/23/05: Less than 24 hours after posting, the cache disappeared. Fortunately, I had saved the page:
http://www.fight-back.us/4-22-05-Google-cache-LizardKing-Exposed.htm
From the page:
Lizardking: “… Moral of the story, never let evidence stand in the way of an expensive lawsuit.”
Lizardking: “… So there were not an special grounds or situation for the non-PP [inquiries]. I basically just was looking for a reason to sue and get money.”
Lizardking about suing a creditor for reporting an account to a CRA after he disputed it as not his account due to ID theft, even though it WAS his account:
“… That one is close to settling already, even though they have a photocopy of my 2001 DL, SSN card and a few checks where I made payments. I am actually surprised that they are talking so seriously about settlement since they have so much good stuff. ...”
Then you can read the scans of the court filings:
The affidavit by Frank Porter, apparently a collection attorney. Which collector does he represent?
Another excerpt from a Lizardking posting: “My next favorite lawsuit is to wait for 1st collection letter. Then I draft a dispute letter, date it for a time period between the two collection letters. File a lawsuit against the credit bureau and claim that they continued collection activity by sending their 2nd letter. They settle for $1,500 every time on that one. This game is great when you play by the same rules that the collection agencies use.”
Next is the scan of a court order requiring that LizardKing PAY legal fees and costs to NCO.
Then we can see how the Lizardking postings from the credit boards were traced to James Morrison.
Next we see the scans with various Morrison signatures, clearly indicating that he deliberately changed his signature to make it look like he did not sign the application for his Lexus lease.
Then the page implies that Morrison is also a debt collector, using the settlements from the suits to fund his debt purchases.
When I first saw that page, I was outraged. Morrison gives all consumers a bad name.
On 4/20/05 the Phoenix federal court ruled that it’s OK for Ameriquest to make false promises and misrepresent its services.
So now I’m wondering, maybe Morrison just did what you’re supposed to do to make a buck?
Last night I posted:
“I honestly can see no other end result than either an apathetic population controlled by debt, happy pills and TV or a very violent revolution.”
I don’t see a revolution happening any time soon. And I should have mentioned that those “evil corporations” are all run by people. People like you and me and Judge Wake and James Morrison aka LizardKing. Obviously, there are few corporate execs like me, most are a lot more like Morrison.
So we’re looking at a society with the corporations in charge of the governments, the apathetic population controlled by debt, happy pills and TV and a few people like Morrison who use the system of lies and deceipt to make a buck in court, defrauding the corporations who defraud the apathetic population.
If Morrison wasn’t such an idiot, posting his strategies all over the web, he could easily live off his lawsuits and never work again. I really despise people like him. But then again, he’s no worse than Ameriquest and Wells Fargo and the Buckley Law Firm.
So what happened to Morrison aka LizardKing?
Did he get away with his lies like Ameriquest and Wells Fargo and Household and Capital One and Experian and literally thousands of scummy corporations?
Credit - Collection - Economic News • James Morrison aka Lizardking • Court - rulings - procedures • (2) Comments • Permalink
