Fighting credit bureaus, creditors and debt buyers

Statue of limitations for FDCPA claims due to litigation | Litigation Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Forum RSS sp_ForumIcon
Statue of limitations for FDCPA claims due to litigation
Midland's and Bursey & Associates' motion for judgment on the pleadings granted because the "[f]iling a complaint is the debt collector’s last opportunity to comply with the Act." [Naas]
sp_TopicIcon
Naas v. Stolman, 130 F.3d 892, 893 (9th Cir.1997) (SOL runs on the date an offending lawsuit was filed).
In Naas the ONLY alleged violation was the filing of the lawsuit, NOT attorney misconduct during litigation.
Posts 1
Views 1028
No permission to create posts
sp_TopicIcon
Lyons v. Michael & Assocs., 2013 WL 4680179 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2013) [venue]
From the 1/30/14 ORDER: "Defendants cite the recent decision in Lyons v. Michael & Assocs., 2013 WL 4680179 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2013), for the premise that the statute of limitations begins to run on the date an offending lawsuit is filed." However, Lyons had no claims regarding violations AFTER the filing of the debt collection suit.
Posts 1
Views 715
No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: America/Phoenix

Most Users Ever Online: 27

Currently Online:
1 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

desert316: 1

colorfinger: 1

blastfrompast: 1

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 0

Members: 9

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 2

Forums: 11

Topics: 30

Posts: 37

Newest Members:

Kerri, colorfinger, CoitisUMidland, blastfrompast, gmariel13, jawllms, desert316, Garyt, toman67, christine

Administrators: christine: 36